Nothing's wrong with it and in fact there have been very few calls since Tuesday for Clinton to drop out. She'll have to decide for herself when she wants to go.

Fox News?

I see no problem with continued voting, but it IS possible to win before everyone has voted, and there IS only one metric that matters, and that's delegates.

So, yes, Hillary should carry on if she wants to.  I just wish the campaign would take on a more positive tone (or anti-McCain...makes no difference), so that we begin unifying the party, which will help no matter which candidate becomes the nominee.

You don't get it; everyone is okay with her continuing with the election.  The problem is the way she is going about it, with her "white" people talk.  If she can be respectful and stop attacking our nominee people wouldn't have a problem.

Feel free to vote.  

We were able to vote when Clinton lead in the SD race by 100+ SD's, we can still vote with Obama leading in SD's.  

We now just have a better idea of where the end game leads.  

I've never advocated that we somehow call off the remaining primaries.

Letting people hope that she can make up 28 points with 30 seconds left on the clock is incredibly dishonest, though.

Here's the answer: The voting results; that's what's wrong with voting...The results tell the truth when it comes to electability and many can't handle the truth.

The Republicans want this race to continue for as long as possible, and it's really easy to see why.  The longer it goes on, the greater  are the chances that the Dems won't unify the party for November, and the more likely it is that McCain won't get much time in the spotlight (the GOP understands that plenty of conservatives don't like him).

I don't think there are many people at this point who think Clinton should drop out before the last primary is run.  Once this happens, though, if Clinton's chances for securing the nomination plummet to zero, she should drop out.  The Dems will need the two months to unify the party and organize the convention.

And seriously--all one needs to know this is true is just see how much FOX News and similar outlets are pushing for the Dem race to continue.  People like Limbaugh and Hannity are the original concern trolls.  C'mon, that's obvious.

Voting is fine.

"Hard-working WHITE PEOPLE" when you're campaigning in WV is a dog whistle, that's not fine.

and, by implication, dissing the strongest most loyal contingent in the democractic party is not fine.

Ann Coulter. Ugh.

If HRC campaigns in the remaining states, will she accept the outcome?

Or is she planning to take the fight to the convention?

If she's planning to take the fight to the convention, then it makes sense for Obama supporters to call for her to quit. She's lost and team Obama should use this to their advantage. He's the presumptive nominee and should get the support of Dem voters.

And since HRC is planning is planning to fight all the way, the Obama campaign should do what it can to win every delegate.

However, if HRC makes a commitment to quit after the voting, then let's play this out without calls for her to quit.

There's nothing wrong with her continuing to campaign, I see little reason for her to stop, as long as she stops the negative ads and attacks. I do however find it slightly disingenuous to point out the increasing numbers of superdelegates declaring for Obama when she had a 100+ majority in endorsements before a single solitary vote was cast. If it was okay for all those supers to declare before a single citizen had voted why is it not okay for them to declare now that so many votes have been cast and the nomination process is winding down?

Nobody has ever suggested that the voting should stop.  

Obama has been consistent in NOT calling for Clinton to get out.  It's her decision and some people are out there offering her advice (her supporters and Obama supporters).  She'll make the decision when she's ready.

So are the HRC supporters calling for Edwards, Richardson, Biden, Kucinich, et al, to be in the race?

Did HRC ever call for candidates to be excluded from debates? On what grounds? They weren't goint to win?

"Flavia" needs to brush up on her politicking...Smackdown!

They can be in the race if they want. They chose not to be. It's all about choice.

It's fine if she wants to stay in, but there is much better chance that Obama will be her parties nominee. If it's a respectful, if she's not trying to tear down the person she's going to have to turn around and tell everyone to vote for in a month, stay in.

Show me where Obama asked Hillary to drop out.  Or show me something that says he doesn't want the remaining states/territory to vote.

I'd like to address this especially because I haven't called for Clinton to drop out, but have been repeatedly accused of doing so.

I have explained why Obama has won and Clinton has no chance (short of a giant unexpected bombshell of the sort where it wouldn't matter if she'd suspended her campaign already); I have called on people to stop voting for her even if they'd have preferred her; and I have explained why I think a convention fight would be very harmful, while knowing who our nominee is in time to plan the convention that way would be very helpful.  Because of these things, people assume that I want her to drop out even when I say that I don't.  So, I wonder if you're making a similar mistake, lumping in people who are calling for her to drop out with those who aren't, and thus seeing the call to drop out as an overwhelming consensus when it's not.

I've also been accused of wanting to "force her to drop out", or "prevent people from voting", or "take her off the ballot", and your title suggests some of those things.  That's not even an understandable misunderstanding, it's just hyperbole.  To be clear, if Clinton suspends her campaign:

1. It should be by her own choice, not force
   
2. She would remain on the ballot wherever she qualified
   
3. Primaries would still be held as scheduled and people could still vote for her.

So the real question is, "what's wrong with continued campaigning after having already lost?"  Since your premise (and a true one) is that we know Obama has already won, what those people who call on her to drop out are implicitly saying is "she should not continue campaigning because she has lost".  That's not my position, but it is their position.  That is the question you should be asking.  You'll find that it's not a ridiculous position.  Although I don't agree with it, there are reasonable arguments to be made for it.